Achebe’s Book on Biafra: ‘War against Biafrans is not ended yet’: Onyema Uche replies Rotomi, CPC chieftain


In a press release by CPC, as published by Pundit, the party’s spokesman, Mr Rotomi Fashakan was furious in his response to Prof. Chinua Achebe’s ”war time memoir”. According to Rotomi Fashakan, the memoir was unnecessary and anti peace time and ill conceived. He maintained that Nigeria has gone pass the war that ended 40 years ago.

He said, ”“What you now see is that there is basically exiguous information in the memoir that obviates the need to ‘sheathe sword’ in stirring up a needless controversy in a state with fragile nationhood. From all intents and purposes, Prof Chinua Achebe projected a very parochial opinion about the war. I do not expect ancients like him to bring up memories that will further exacerbate the inflamed passions on the war. It is even very unfair to the memory of Chief Obafemi Awolowo because, at that time, he felt the policy of withholding feeding- which he had said was mainly directed at the Biafran fighting force- was meant to bring the war to a quick end.”

It baffles me that a man of great learning like Rotomi would speak in such a manner that would display such excessive lack of remorse and total lack of value for the millions of lives destroyed by Awolowo’s policies. He was out to canonize Awolowo but thinks the death of more than 3 million people starved to death by Awolowo should belong to the forgotten past. I consider his remarks on Achebe’s memoir an insult to Ndi Igbo, an open support for the actions of Awolowo and by extension all the Yorubas who actively participated in the murder of Igbos.


Awolowo was in prison during the conflict, it was the Biafran government that released him. Instead of being grateful he turned around to massacre those who showed him kindness. If the policy of starvation was war time exigency, how about the policy of giving every Igbo 20 Nigerian pounds in exchange for whatever amount you deposited in the bank?

How about the privatization policy that put Ndi Igbo out of cooperate ownership in Nigerian economy? It is important for truth to be told. Awolowo and Benjamin Adekunle were the most two of the Yorubas that hated Igbos with passion. Any justification of Awolowo’s murderous policies against Ndi Igbo is nothing but intellectual dishonest and criminal logic.

It has become common belief among many Nigerians that the civil war has ended long time and therefore should belong to the past of our history. This view circulated by many elite Nigerians as despicable as it is; shows the soullessness of Nigeria. It speaks volumes of how perverse the consciences of Nigerians consciences. It is a hard reality that the war will never end in principle. No wonder war criminals still parade themselves as leaders of this nation. The Nigeria’s genocide against Ndi Igbo is our holocaust and we will be damned if we forget or give up till justice is served.

It is imperative to ask here if the war has indeed ended. Do Igbos have past in Nigeria? Has the ”operation Araba” proclaimed on May 30, 1966, that led to the massacre of 500,000 Igbos ended? This massacre has continued till date in the North. The Igbo sons and daughters are still being butchered in the streets of North even without provocation. Ndi Igbo are still being seen and called ”dogs, baboons and monkeys” in Nigeria and are killed as such. Is it not a continuation of the war Rotomi wants us to believe has ended? Nigeria’s soulless government has kept dumb and numb to the issue of abandoned property in Nigeria. The draconian policies formulated immediately after the war, and by successive military governments are still being implemented at the federal level to keep marginalizing Ndi Igbo. Is it not a continuation of the war said to have ended? It is funny that no one has been charged, tried and convicted for spilling Igbo blood in the North. No family of the victims ever received any form of compensation from the government, and till date there has been no record of the government visiting victims families in solidarity with their pain. Does this indifference not prove that the government rejoices in the face of near extinction of the Igbos?

Yeah you are right, ”the war has ended”. The war is still on, the only difference is one side is not armed and no one is defending. We are always going through our holocaust with the humility and courage of the innocent sheep.

I want to say to you Rotomi Fashola, that your type represents the hypocrisy of Nigeria. You have never been read condemning the war crimes against Ndi Igbo. Your name is not on record among those who have criticized the federal policies that hold Ndi Igbo in bondage in their own country, and here you are speaking with despicable impunity against a man of courage, a man of principle because he dared to tell the children the truth.

 The civil war will not end until Muritala Muhamed is posthumously tried for his war crimes against Ndi Igbo. The war will not end till Gowon is tried for crimes against humanity. Till Benjamin Adekunle, Omar Fanda Ike Nwachukwu, David Mark and a host of others are brought to face war crime charges the war would not be over. In Nigeria, Ndi Igbo have no past. Our past is in today and becomes our tomorrow. It is wicked to refer to the memoir recounts as past experience.


6 thoughts on “Achebe’s Book on Biafra: ‘War against Biafrans is not ended yet’: Onyema Uche replies Rotomi, CPC chieftain

  1. Rotomi is a very stupid man. D guy disgusts me. They are out to protect Awolowo deir fada who provided all things for them and throwing away d fact that there is no excuse for genocide. The only reason Gowon is not standing trial for these crimes is because they know their action was genocidal so they are hiding the truth. Soon, they will receive their punishment just like boko haram is tormenting the north now


  2. While ‘They’ Think They Are Making Nigeria Ungovernable: FG secures N4.89trn investment commitmentsBreaking News: Bankole, Nafada have no case to answer – Court »
    Yorubas are the Problem with Nigeria – By Sanusi Lamido Sanusi
    Via Wed, 05/27/2009 – 11:01

    By Sanusi Lamido Sanusi, the Prospective Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria

    In sum, the Yoruba political leadership, as mentioned by Balarabe Musa, has shown itself over the years to be incapable of rising above narrow tribal interests and reciprocating goodwill from other sections of the country by treating other groups with respect. Practically every crisis in Nigeria since independence has its roots in this attitude.

    i. The Yoruba elite and area-boy politics;
    ii. Igbo marginalisation and the responsible limits of retribution; and
    iii. The Yoruba Factor and “Area-boy” Politics.

    See also The Adulteress’ Diary by Lamido Sanusi

    My views on the Yoruba political leadership have been thoroughly articulated in some of my writings, prime among which was ” Afenifere: Syllabus of Errors” published by This Day (The Sunday Newspaper) on Sept 27, 1998. There was also an earlier publication in the weekly Trust entitled ” The Igbo, the Yoruba and History” (Aug. 21, 1998).
    In sum, the Yoruba political leadership, as mentioned by Balarabe Musa, has shown itself over the years to be incapable of rising above narrow tribal interests and reciprocating goodwill from other sections of the country by treating other groups with respect. Practically every crisis in Nigeria since independence has its roots in this attitude.
    The Yoruba elite were the first, in 1962, to attempt a violent overthrow of an elected government in this country. In 1966, it was the violence in the West which provided an avenue for the putsch of 15th January. After Chief Awolowo lost to Shagari in 1983 elections, it was the discontent and bad publicity in the South-West which led to the Buhari intervention.
    When Buhari jailed UPN governors like Ige and Onabanjo, the South-Western press castigated that good government and provided the right mood for IBB to take over power. As soon as IBB cleared UPN governors of charges against them in a politically motivated retrial, he became the darling of the South-West. When IBB annulled the primaries in which Adamu Ciroma and Shehu Yar Adua emerged as presidential candidates in the NRC and SDP, he was hailed by the South-West. When the same man annulled the June 12, 1993 elections in which Abiola was the front-runner, the South-West now became defenders of democracy.

    When it seemed Sani Abacha was sympathetic to Abiola, the South-West supported his take-over. He was in fact invited by a prominent NADECO member to take over in a published letter shortly before the event. Even though Abiola had won the elections in the North, the North was blamed for its annulment. When Abdulsalam Abubakar started his transition, the Yoruba political leadership through NADECO presented a memorandum on a Government of National Unity that showed complete disrespect for the intelligence and liberties of other Nigerians.
    Subsequently, they formed a tribal party which failed to meet minimum requirements for registration, but was registered all the same to avoid the violence that was bound to follow non-registration, given the area-boy mentality of South-West politicians. Having rejected an Obasanjo candidacy and challenged the election as a fraud in court, we now find a leading member of the AD in the government, a daughter of an Afenifere leader as Minister of State, and Awolowo´s daughter as Ambassador, all appointed by a man who won the election through fraud.

    Meanwhile, nothing has been negotiated for the children of Abiola, the focus of Yoruba political activity. In return for these favours, the AD solidly voted for Evan Enwerem as Senate President. This is a man who participated in the two-million- man March for Abacha´s self-succession. He also is reputed to have hosted a meeting of governors during IBB´s transition, demanding that June 12 elections should never be de-annulled and threatening that the East would go to war if this was done. When Ibrahim Salisu Buhari was accused of swearing to a false affidavit, the Yoruba political elite correctly took up the gauntlet for his resignation.

    When an AD governor, Bola Tinubu, swears to a false affidavit that he attended an Ivy League University which he did not attend, we hear excuses.

    For so many years, the Yoruba have inundated this country with stories of being marginalised and of a civil service dominated by northerners through quota system. The Federal Character Commission has recently released a report which shows that the South-West accounts for 27.8% of civil servants in the range GL08 to GL14 and a full 29.5% of GL 15 and above. One zone out of six zones controls a full 30% of the civil service leaving the other five zones to share the remaining 70%. We find the same story in the economy, in academia, in parastatals.

    Yet in spite of being so dominant, the Yoruba complained and complained of marginalization. Of recent, in recognition of the trauma which hit the South-West after June 12, the rest of the country forced everyone out of the race to ensure that a South-Westerner emerged, often against the best advice of political activists.

    Instead of leading a path of reconciliation and strong appreciation, the Yoruba have embarked on short-sighted triumphalism, threatening other “nationalities” that they ( who after all lost the election) will protect Obasanjo ( who was forced on them). No less a person than Bola Ige has made such utterances.

    To further show that they were in charge, they led a cult into the Hausa area of Sagamu, murdered a Hausa woman and nothing happened. In the violence that followed, they killed several Hausa residents, with Yoruba leaders like Segun Osoba, reminding Nigerians of the need to respect the culture of their host communities. This would have continued were it not for the people of Kano who showed that they could also create their own Oro who would only be appeased through the shedding of innocent Yoruba blood.

    I say all this, to support Balarabe Musa´s statement, that the greatest problem to nation-building in Nigeria are the Yoruba Bourgeoisie. I say this also to underscore my point that until they change this attitude, no conference can solve the problems of Nigeria. We cannot move forward if the leadership of one of the largest ethnic groups continues to operate, not like statesmen, but like common area boys.

    iii.The Igbo Factor and the Reasonable Limits of Retribution.

    The Igbo people of Nigeria have made a mark in the history of this nation. They led the first successful military coup which eliminated the Military and Political leaders of other regions while letting off Igbo leaders. Nwafor Orizu, then Senate President, in consultation with President Azikiwe, subverted the constitution and handed over power to Aguiyi-Ironsi. Subsequent developments, including attempts at humiliating other peoples, led to the counter-coup and later the civil war. The Igbos themselves must acknowledge that they have a large part of the blame for shattering the unity of this country.

    Having said that, this nation must realise that Igbos have more than paid for their foolishness. They have been defeated in war, rendered paupers by monetary policy fiat, their properties declared abandoned and confiscated, kept out of strategic public sector appointments and deprived of public services. The rest of the country forced them to remain in Nigeria and has continued to deny them equity.

    The Northern Bourgeoisie and the Yoruba Bourgeoisie have conspired to keep the Igbo out of the scheme of things. In the recent transition when the Igbo solidly supported the PDP in the hope of an Ekwueme presidency, the North and South-West treated this as a Biafra agenda. Every rule set for the primaries, every gentleman´s agreement was set aside to ensure that Obasanjo, not Ekwueme emerged as the candidate. Things went as far as getting the Federal Government to hurriedly gazette a pardon. Now, with this government, the marginalistion of the Igbo is more complete than ever before. The Igbos have taken all these quietly because, they reason, they brought it upon themselves. But the nation is sitting on a time-bomb.

    After the First World War, the victors treated Germany with the same contempt Nigeria is treating Igbos. Two decades later, there was a Second World War, far costlier than the first. Germany was again defeated, but this time, they won a more honourable peace. Our present political leaders have no sense of History. There is a new Igbo man, who was not born in 1966 and neither knows nor cares about Nzeogwu and Ojukwu. There are Igbo men on the street who were never Biafrans. They were born Nigerians, are Nigerians, but suffer because of actions of earlier generations. They will soon decide that it is better to fight their own war, and may be find an honourable peace, than to remain in this contemptible state in perpetuity.

    The Northern Bourgeoisie and the Yoruba Bourgeoisie have exacted their pound of flesh from the Igbos. For one Sardauna, one Tafawa Balewa, one Akintola and one Okotie-Eboh, hundreds of thousands have died and suffered.

    If this issue is not addressed immediately, no conference will solve Nigeria´s problems.

    By Sanusi Lamido SanusiBeing Excerpts from A Paper Presented At The “National Conference On The 1999 Constitution” Jointly Organised By The Network For Justice And The Vision Trust Foundation, At The Arewa House, Kaduna From 11th –12th September, 1999.

    Read the full essay here: uring.html

    See also The Adulteress’ Diary by Lamido Sanusi


  3. The truth must be told no matter how it hurts them. It is not a hidden truth that none of them wants any Igbo man to succeed or even talk in Nigeria. All of them must be charged for crimes against humanity, if not today, then that day is coming.


  4. The truth has to be told lest it be lost! The criminals of world war II are still being brought to to justice! The wounds inflicted by the Nigerian – Biafran civil war shall heal after the truth has been told and appreciated, and appologies correctly rendered where necessary. A presumed oblitration of the memory of the most difficult past of the Igbos as a people is a further insult and to say the least, adding salt to injury!


  5. Well articulated, so on point bro Onyema you have done well to expose the hypocrisy of the Nigerian Government. The blood of the innocents will continue to hunt Nigeria until they reconcile with the truth.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s